Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Padro

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 8, 1990PublishedCited by 143 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Order affirmed. A postverdict motion made pursuant to CPL 330.30 is not, by itself, ordinarily sufficient to preserve a "question of law” within the meaning of CPL 470.05 (2) and inasmuch as defendant failed to make appropriate objections during trial, the points presented by defendant are not preserved for review in this court.

Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa. Taking no part: Judge Alexander.

2Cited by143 opinions

  1. People v. HarrisNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Miguel Miranda v. Floyd BennettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  3. People v. BorukhovaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
  4. People v. LaGuerreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  5. People v. RichardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

138 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API