People v. Ellis
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.
We agree with the Appellate Division that defendant’s trial representation was not constitutionally deficient. The evidence revealed that on September 14, 1989, a Woolworth’s store *856detective observed defendant on the main shopping floor acting "very suspicious.” The detective and a store manager followed defendant to the basement, where he secreted washcloths in his clothing. Defendant then returned to the main floor where he was intercepted by store personnel.
Defendant denied doing anything wrong, and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. BaldiNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- People v. DrozNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. EllisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3Cited by95 opinions
- People v. BeneventoNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
- People v. WalkerNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- People v. ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
- People v. BoydAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- People v. MuradAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.