Cruz v. New York
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scalia
In Bruton v. United States, 391 U. S. 123 (1968), we held that a defendant is deprived of his rights under the Confrontation Clause when his codefendant’s incriminating con*188fession is introduced at their joint trial, even if the jury is instructed to consider that confession only against the co-defendant. In Parker v. Randolph, 442 U. S. 62 (1979), we considered, but were unable authoritatively to resolve, the question whether Bruton applies where the defendant’s own confession, corroborating that of his codefendant, is introduced against him. We resolve that question today.
HH
Jerry Cruz was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Harrington v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Lee v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Parker v. RandolphSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by696 opinions
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Lilly v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- People v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
691 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.