Legal Opinion

Martin v. Ortho Pharmaceuticals

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 22, 1994No. 1-93-3367PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRESIDING JUSTICE HOFFMAN

delivered the opinion of the court:

The plaintiffs appeal from an order of the circuit court of Cook County granting summary judgment in favor of the defendant on their two-count complaint alleging strict product liability. For the following reasons, we reverse and remand.

The plaintiffs filed a complaint against the defendant alleging that an oral contraceptive, Ortho-Novum 1/50, which it manufactured was unreasonably dangerous because, inter alia, it "was not accompanied with a warning to the general public, users and consumers” that the drug caused physical…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Suvada v. White Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
  2. Weinberger v. Hynson, Westcott & Dunning, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Kirk v. Michael Reese Hospital & Medical CenterIllinois Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Pyne v. WitmerIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  5. In Re Estate of HooverIllinois Supreme Court · 1993

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. MARTIN BY MARTIN v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Pluto v. Searle LaboratoriesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1997
  3. Edwards v. Basel PharmaceuticalsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  4. Alpha Edwards v. Basel PharmaceuticalsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
  5. Edwards v. Basel PharmaceuticalCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API