Legal Opinion

Weinberger v. Hynson, Westcott & Dunning, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 18, 1973No. 72-394PublishedCited by 507 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Douglas

These cases, together with Weinberger v. Bentex Pharmaceuticals, Inc., post, p. 645, CIBA Corp. v. Weinberger, post, p. 640, and USV Pharmaceutical Corp. v. Weinberger, post, p. 655, all here on certiorari, raise a series of questions under the 1962 amendments1 to the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act of 1938. 52 Stat. 1040. The 1938 Act, which established a system of premarketing clearance for drugs, prohibited the introduction into commerce of any “new drug” unless a new drug application (NDA) filed with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) 2 was effective with respect to that drug. §…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Permian Basin Area Rate CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by507 opinions

  1. United Sav. Assn. of Tex. v. Timbers of Inwood Forest Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. American Textile Manufacturers Institute, Inc. v. DonovanSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. United States v. RutherfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. Espinoza v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982
  5. Alabama Power Company v. Douglas M. Costle, as Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency, Sierra Club, Intervenors.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980

502 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API