Pluto v. Searle Laboratories
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Quinn
Plaintiff Susan Pluto (Pluto) appeals from a jury verdict in favor of defendant Searle Laboratories (Searle). Pluto raises 14 separate issues on appeal. Our determination of this case necessitates our reaching only one of these issues: whether Searle owed a duty of care to warn Pluto in this product liability case alleging strict liability. Jurisdiction is vested in this court pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 301 (155 Ill. 2d R. 301).
For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the circuit court.
The relevant facts are as follows. In May of 1978, Pluto opted to have Searle’s Copper 7…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Hunt v. BlasiusIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
- Haudrich v. Howmedica, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
- Gouge v. Central Illinois Public Service Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
- MARTIN BY MARTIN v. Ortho Pharmaceutical Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1996
- Depre v. Power Climber, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Hansen v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1999
- Sherr-Una Booker v. C. R. Bard, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Jones v. RallosAppellate Court of Illinois · 2008
- Weedon v. Pfizer, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2002
- Jones v. RallosAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.