Legal Opinion

Sansome v. Myers

California Supreme Court

Decided September 11, 1889No. 20452PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Application to the Supreme Court for a writ of mandate. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorks, J.

A statement of this case will be found in 77 Cal. 353, where the allegations of the respondent’s answer are stated. We there held that the answer was sufficient. Subsequently the issues arising upon the petition and answer were referred for trial and determination to Hon. W. 0. Van Fleet, judge of the superior court of Sacramento County, with directions to report his findings to this court, which he has done.

The findings are as follows:—■

“ 1. That said proposed bill was noticed for settlement on the seventeenth day of April, 1888, and was on said day called up by petitioner’s counsel before…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sansome v. MyresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Western States Construction Co. v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Randall v. MousseauCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Eisenberg v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  4. Cohen v. WallaceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Hertter v. AddisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API