Legal Opinion

Knight v. Tannehill Bros., Inc.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 6, 1940No. 5154PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stokes, justice.,

Plaintiffs in error, R. L. Knight, Jr., Martha E. Davis, joined by her husband, G. E. Davis, Eva Ruth Weiss, joined by her husband, J. R. Weiss, and Alton E. Knight, a minor, appearing by his next friend and legal guardian, Martha E. Davis, filed this suit against L. B. Tan-nehill and wife, Lillian B. Tannehill, C. C. Tannehill, John Q. Tannehill, Mrs. Lillian Hink’le and her husband, Clarence E. Hinkle, Martha E. Tannehill, a feme sole, and Maud E. Tannehill, a feme sole, who appear here as defendants in error. Plaintiffs in error, except G. E. Davis and J. R. Weiss, are the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. James v. FulcrodTexas Supreme Court · 1851
  2. McCamey v. Hollister Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  3. Faville v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Masterson v. Amarillo Oil Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1923
  5. Summerville v. KingTexas Supreme Court · 1904

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Gurley v. LindsleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  2. Ditto v. PiperCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  3. Hamill & Smith v. ParrCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  4. Barber v. ColemanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1943
  5. Miller v. WhittenburgCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API