McCamey v. Hollister Oil Co.
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from District Court, Tarrant County; R. E. L. Roy, Judge. Action by George B. MeCamey against the Hollister Oil Company, Warren H. Hollister,, William Hettesheimer, and Charles J. Geiser. Judgment for plaintiff against the defendant company and the individual defendants as trustees, but denying personal judgment against the individual defendants, and. plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtDunklin, J.
George B. McCamey 'drilled an oil well for the Hollister Oil Company, under a contract in writing which consisted of a written proposition, dated at Port Worth, Tex., signed by McCamey and addressed to the “Hollister Oil Company,” at Port Worth, Tex., and accepted by that company. The offer made by McCamey included his proposition to drill and certain material mentioned necessary thereto, also stating $38,500 as the price which would be charged for the work and material, and the dates for the payment of the same. Below the signature of McCamey to that proposition was the following:
“We accept…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Crocker v. MalleySupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Williams v. Inhabitants of MiltonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
- Frost v. ThompsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1914
- Dana v. TreasurerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1917
- Industrial Lumber Co. v. Texas Pine Land Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by51 opinions
- Thompson v. SchmittTexas Supreme Court · 1925
- West Side Oil Co. v. McDormanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
- Wheeler v. HaralsonTexas Supreme Court · 1937
- Carp v. Texas State Board of Examiners in OptometryCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
- Graham Hotel Corp. v. LeaderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.