Legal Opinion

Gurley v. Lindsley

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 21, 1972No. 71-1683PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GODBOLD, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs in this case claimed an interest in two tracts of Texas land, called Mound Lake and Rich Lake, and a share of past royalties from oil production under a lease covering Mound Lake. In a non jury trial the District Court found for the plaintiffs. We affirm on what appear to be the major issues and remand for necessary additional proceedings.

The litigation springs from a consent judgment entered in 1948 between the respective predecessors in interest of the plaintiffs and of the defendants. In that year A. L. Gurley was plaintiff and H. K. Lindsley defendant in…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Eyerly Aircraft Co. v. Jack Killian, Individually and for and on Behalf of Jan Killian, a MinorCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  5. Faulkner v. ReedTexas Commission of Appeals · 1922

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Product Promotions, Inc. v. Jacques Y. CousteauCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  2. James Owens v. Republic of SudanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2017
  3. Alliant Tax Credit 31, Inc. v. M. Vincent Murphy, IIICourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
  4. In Re GoffCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  5. Hoppenfeld v. CrookCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API