Legal Opinion

Coffman v. United States Steel Corp.

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided May 5, 2016No. Case No. 14-12273PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER Denying Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment [22]

Arthur J. Tarnow, Senior United States District Judge

Plaintiff sues her employer for allegedly discriminating against her as a white woman and retaliating against her for protesting the alleged discrimination. On September 30, 2015, Defendant filed the instant Motion for Summary Judgment [Dkt. #22]. On October 30, 2015, Plaintiff filed a Response [25], to which Defendant filed a Reply [28] on November 16, 2015. At the conclusion of a hearing held on April 13, 2016, the Court took the motion under advisement.

For the reasons stated…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. University of Tex. Southwestern Medical Center v. NassarSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  2. Staub v. Proctor HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  3. John B. Johnson v. University of Cincinnati, Joseph A. Steger, and Donald C. HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
  4. Mickey v. Zeidler Tool and Die Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
  5. Hemi Group, LLC v. City of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Khan v. Canonical USA, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2019
  2. O'Connor v. The Lampo Group, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API