O'Connor v. The Lampo Group, LLC
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION CAITLIN O’CONNOR, ) ) Plaintiff, ) NO. 3:20-cv-00628 ) v. ) JUDGE RICHARDSON ) THE LAMPO GROUP, LLC, ) ) Defendant. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION Pending before the Court is Defendant’s “Motion to Dismiss Count V of Plaintiff’s Third Amended Complaint.”1 (Doc. No. 39, “Motion”). Count V of the Third Amended Complaint asserts claims for violations of the Tennessee Human Rights Act (“THRA”) and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”) based on religious discrimination and retaliation. (Doc. No. 37…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.