Legal Opinion
Clay v. Howard University
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 11, 2015No. Civil Action No. 2013-1464PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
TANYA S. CHUTEAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Linda Clay asserts statutory and tort claims against her former employer and supervisor related to the end of her employment in the Human Resources department at Howard University. Defendants Howard University and James Jones have each moved to dismiss Clay’s complaint, and Clay moved orally to amend the complaint at oral argument on the motions to dismiss on February 11, 2015. For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants Plaintiffs motion for leave to amend and grants Jones’ motion to dismiss Count III against him. The Court…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Dolly Kyle Browning and Direct Outstanding Creations Corporation v. William Jefferson ClintonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. St. Francis Xavier Parochial School and St. Francis Xavier ChurchCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bartlette v. Hyatt RegencyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Perry v. International Brotherhood of TeamstersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Alberti v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- Hodge v. L'avant-GardeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
- Johnson v. Georgetown UniversityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.