Legal Opinion
Perry v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 24, 2017No. Civil Action No. 2015-1326PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
TANYA S. CHUTEAN, United States District Judge
This case arises out of Plaintiff Henry Perry’s inability to obtain lifetime retiree health benefits after working for the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (IBT) for seventeen years. Defendants IBT and the Teamsters Benefit Trust (TBT) maintain that Plaintiff was not eligible for lifetime retiree health benefits because he did not meet the required term or age criteria. Plaintiff maintains that Defendants discriminated against him in violation of federal and state law and improperly denied him benefits. For the reasons…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Taylor v. SturgellSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Federated Department Stores, Inc. v. MoitieSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Capitol Services Management Inc. v. Vesta CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2023
- Miller v. Downtown D.C. Business Improvement DistrictDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Miller v. Downtown D.C. Business Improvement DistrictDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Mills v. Anadolu Agency Na, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2020