Wass v. Anderson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Peterson, Justice.
Plaintiffs are individuals and corporations doing business as commercial truck stops. They brought suit against defendants, seven state officers and two other individuals, for a declaratory judgment that L. 1975, c. 203, is unconstitutional because it violates Minn. Const, art. 4, § 17, the “single subject rule”; 1 and because it violates art. 4, § 21, proscribing passage of a bill on the last day of the legislative biennial session. The trial court granted defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff appeals from the entry of summary judgment on the sole ground that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Minnesota Ex Rel. Pearson v. Probate Court of Ramsey CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Johnson v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
- State Ex Rel. Pearson v. Probate CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1939
- State v. CassidySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1875
- State ex rel. Marr v. StearnsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Richard T. Van Bergen v. State of Minnesota Hubert H. Humphrey, Iii, in His Capacity as Attorney General of the State of MinnesotaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1995
- State v. First National Bank of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- State Ex Rel. Wisconsin Senate v. ThompsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988
- Associated Builders & Contractors v. VenturaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2000
- State v. MitjansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.