Resky v. Meyer
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Parker, J.
This was a suit by a real estate broker for commissions on a sale claimed to have been procured by him. The District Court, in giving judgment for the plaintiff, held that he was the “procuring cause of the sale” and the Supreme Court, without entering into any review of the evidence, held simply that there was evidence from which it was permissible for the District Court to make that finding of fact, and affirmed on that ground. This affirmance was, of course, proper if there was any such evidence; bnt our examination of the case leads to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Ritch v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
- Gormley v. DangelMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1913
3Cited by11 opinions
- Boise Cascade Home v. DIV. OF NJ REAL ESTATENew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
- Winter v. ToldtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
- Reiser v. JenningsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
- Kennedy v. HartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Matz v. BessmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.