Legal Opinion

Matz v. Bessman

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided February 20, 1923PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

This is a suit by a real estate broker for commission claimed to have been earned on a sale. The authorization by the owner was based on a definite net price to be obtained and the broker was to have as commission all over that price, very much as in the case of Mendles v. Danish, 74 N. J. L. 333. The price fixed was $7,200, and plaintiff secured a purchaser at $7,700, who was plainly satisfactory to the .defendant because defendant contracted with him at that *6figure. After the contract was signed, the purchaser discovered he was financially unable to carry, out the contract, probably because…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Resky v. MeyerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1922

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Richard v. FalletiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
  2. Winter v. ToldtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API