Gormley v. Dangel
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtRugg, C. J.
This is an action for money had and received. The testimony was not much in conflict. The plaintiff is a real estate agent, who received authority from the owner to procure offers "for a house and lot. He had a series of negotiations with the defendant, whereby the latter learned that the lowest price and terms which the owner would take for the property was $6,000 in cash. Thereupon in November, 1908, he ceased relations with the plaintiff. On January 8, 1909, a deed of the property was made by the owner to one Ross, the brother-in-law of the defendant, and a deed from Ross to the defendant,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Smith v. First National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1868
- Bigwood v. Boston & Northern Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1911
- Cohen v. AmesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
- Childs v. American Express Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
- Willard v. WrightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Holton v. ShepardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
- Davis v. HoweSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
- Moncion v. BertrandSupreme Court of Vermont · 1925
- Ritch v. RobertsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
- Resky v. MeyerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1922
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.