Legal Opinion

Kennedy v. Hart

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided March 12, 1940No. 28609PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavison, J.

The defendant in error, a real estate agent, commenced this action against the plaintiff in error to recover a brokerage commission on the price for which a farm belonging to the latter was sold.

The parties will hereinafter be referred to by their trial court designations of “plaintiff” and “defendant.”

The agreement herein sought to be enforced is an oral one which the parties entered into in November or December, 1936. As far as concerns the issues dealt with herein, the only promise that the defendant made was that if the plaintiff “could get $15,000” for the farm, he would pay him “5% of…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Schwartze v. YearlyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
  2. Bentley v. EdwardsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  3. Hughes & Thurman v. DoddMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912
  4. Artlin Realty Co. v. GlassSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
  5. J. L. Lemmon Co. v. OppenheimerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Harris v. ConwaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
  2. Roscow v. BaraMontana Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Kennedy Kennedy v. VanceSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API