Legal Opinion
Baker v. State
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided March 2, 1972No. 2 CA-CIV 1163PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOWARD, Judge.
This is a special action wherein the petitioner questions the order of the trial court denying his constitutional challenge of A.R.S. § 13-895, subsec. A, as amended. The respondents have filed a cross-petition contending that the trial court erred in declaring A.R.S. § 13-895, subsec. B unconstitutional.
On December 7, 1971, a sixteen count direct information was filed against the petitioner charging him with violating A.R.S. § 13-895. The material parts of this statute provide:
“A. It shall be unlawful for any person, with intent to terrify, intimidate, threaten, harass, annoy…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Cantwell v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Cohen v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. ChildressArizona Supreme Court · 1954
- Duncan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- State v. VogenthalerNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1976
- State v. KipfNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
- District of Columbia v. WaltersDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1974
- State v. ElderSupreme Court of Florida · 1980
- State v. GattisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.