Legal Opinion
State v. Gattis
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided November 26, 1986No. 9176PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BIVINS, Judge.
Defendant appeals his conviction on three counts of use of telephone to harass, annoy or offend, contrary to NMSA 1978, Section 30-20-12 (Repl.Pamp.1984). After a jury trial, defendant was sentenced to eighteen months on each count, to run concurrently. The sentences were suspended and defendant was placed on probation for eighteen months on each count, to run concurrently.
Defendant lists four issues on appeal: (1) whether Section 30-20-12(A) is overbroad; (2) whether that subsection, reasonably interpreted, prohibits conduct which is constitutionally protected; (3)…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Screws v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Cohen v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- State v. SutphinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
- Eddie Maes v. John Thomas, Warden and Attorney General of the State of New MexicoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- State v. KipfNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
- State v. RoybalNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1992
- State v. WoodNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1994
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.