Legal Opinion
District of Columbia v. Walters
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided May 9, 1974No. 6972PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KERN, Associate Judge:
Each appellee was charged on a printed form information by a check made solely in the box designating “INDECENT ACT . commit a lewd, obscene and indecent act ... in violation of Section 22-1112(a) of the District of Columbia Code.” 1 The Police Department forms prepared by the arresting officers and received into evidence by the trial court recite that Hubert Walters and the other eight appellees were arrested inside a commercial establishment in the District of Columbia for engaging in acts of mutual masturbation.
Appellees moved to dismiss the informa-tions on the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Smith v. GoguenSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- Pryor v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Grayson v. AT & T CORP.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
- Pryor v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Saucier v. Countrywide Home LoansDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2013
- Willcher v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.