Legal Opinion

Estate of Klopstock

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 20, 1939No. Civ. 11005PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

The appellants, who are the three brothers of the deceased and are the contestants herein, appeal from the judgment of the trial court admitting to probate a will executed by the deceased in 1932 and setting aside an order previously made admitting to probate a will executed by the deceased in 1925.

The grounds of contest urged in the trial court were that Isaac D. Klopstock, deceased, was not of sound mind when he executed the 1932 will; that said will was the result of undue influence exerted upon said deceased by Grace E. Klopstock, who was the wife of said deceased and by Samuel Samter;…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Estate of ChevallierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Estate of SextonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Finkler v. PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Estate of ShayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. Smith v. SpauldingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Klopstock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API