Waymire v. San Francisco & San Mateo Railway Co.
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order dissolving an injunction. J. M. Seawell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Vanclief, C.
In May, 1891, the defendant railway company issued to the defendant trust company eleven hundred bonds, each for one thousand dollars, in trust, to be sold for the use of the former company, and to secure the payment of said bonds executed to the trust company a trust deed of all its property, consisting of street railroads, franchises, and all personal property pertaining thereto. The bonds bear interest at the rate of six per cent per annum, payable semi-annually, and contain a provision to the effect that, upon certain defaults in the payment of interest, the trustee may elect…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- The Erie Railway Company v. . RamseyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
- Graham v. Boston, Hartford & Erie RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Wickersham v. CrittendenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Bronson v. La Crosse & Milwaukie RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- Neall v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1860
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Difani v. Riverside County Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1927
- Mercantile Trust Co. v. Stockton Terminal & Eastern RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Favorite v. Superior Court of Riverside Co.California Supreme Court · 1919
- Johnson v. Sun Realty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Samter v. Klopstock Realty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1939
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.