Legal Opinion

Samter v. Klopstock Realty Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 20, 1939No. Civ. 11004PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpence, J.

Plaintiff, as the executor of the will of Grace E. Klopstock, deceased, brought this action against the de fendants Klopstock Realty Co., a corporation, Frederick Klopstock, Samuel Klopstock and David Klopstock. The defendants interposed a demurrer which was overruled and the cause proceeded to trial before the court sitting without a jury. The trial court entered judgment in favor of the 11 Estate of Isaac D. Klopstock, deceased, and the personal representative of said deceased and said estate” and against defendants Frederick Klopstock and Samuel Klopstock for sums aggregating approximately…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Wickersham v. CrittendenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Whitten v. DabneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Keck v. KeckCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Anderson v. DerrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Fox v. Hale & Norcross Silver Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1895

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Grimshaw v. Ford Motor Co.California Court of Appeal · 1981
  2. Klopstock v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Bowman v. BowmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Bronco Wine Co. v. Frank A. Logoluso FarmsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
  5. Fazzi v. PetersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API