Leo Foundation, Inc. v. Kiernan
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Opinion of the CourtKinmonth, J.
The plaintiff brought this action upon a written contract to recover tuition for the school term of 1960-1961.1 To this complaint the *13defendant filed a general denial and the following special defenses: (1) The alleged written agreement constituted a registration and not a valid contract; (2) the alleged written agreement was indefinite and uncertain and, therefore, not a binding contract; (3) the alleged written agreement was inapplicable and invalid for the school year from September, 1960, to June, 1961; and (4) the plaintiff and/or its agents failed to abide by its agreement with the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lengel v. New Haven Gas Light Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Texaco, Inc. v. RogowSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- Rosenblatt v. BermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
- Roessler v. BurwellSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1934
- Taft Realty Corp. v. Yorkhaven Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- St. Margaret's-McTernan School, Inc. v. ThompsonConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
- Morton v. SyriacConnecticut Appellate Court · 2020