Legal Opinion
Roessler v. Burwell
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided December 5, 1934PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, C. J.
The basic facts in this case, as found by the trial court, with the addition of certain others as to which there is no dispute, are as follows: The plaintiff, since some time previous to 1926, has been engaged in the business of manufacturing delicatessen products and selling them to retail stores in New Haven County and its vicinity. In 1926 the defendant entered his employment as a salesman. The plaintiff went personally, with the defendant, to the places of business of his customers and introduced the defendant as his salesman. From that time until October 10th, 1929, the defendant…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Clark Paper & Manufacturing Co. v. StenacherNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- McCall Co. v. . WrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Palumbo v. George A. Fuller Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
- Samuel Stores, Inc. v. AbramsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
- Granger v. CravenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Weiss v. WiederlightSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Bridgeport Pipe Engineering Co. v. DeMatteo Construction Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1970
- Central Adjustment Bureau, Inc. v. IngramTennessee Supreme Court · 1984
- Moore v. SerafinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- May v. YoungSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1938
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.