Legal Opinion

Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 8, 1958No. C. D. 2014PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LawreNCE, Judge:

The question presented here is whether certain so-called safety measuring chains imported for use with what are known as Minox cameras should be classified with the cameras as entireties in paragraph 1551 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U. S. C. § 1001, par. 1551), as modified by the Torquay Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 86 Treas. Dec. 121, T. D. 52739, supplemented by Presidential notification, 86 Treas. Dec. 337, T. D. 52820, and subjected to duty at the rate of 15 per centum ad valorem, or as parts of cameras, dutiable at the rate of 20 per centum ad…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. Kalter Mercantile Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1923
  2. Norma Co. of America v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Unimark Photo, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961
  2. Westfield Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API