Legal Opinion

Westfield Manufacturing Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided January 23, 1961No. C.D. 2232PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Judge:

Plaintiff, an American manufacturer of bicycles, has, pursuant to the authorization of section 516(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, challenged the collector’s assessment of duty upon certain imported bicycles at the rate of 11)4 Per centum ad valorem. The collector’s action was taken pursuant to that portion of paragraph 371 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, 82 Treas. Dec. 305, T.D. 51802, supplemented by Presidential proclamation, 90 Treas. Dec. 285, T.D. 53883,1 which provides as follows:

Bicycles with or without tires,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. United States v. Bosch Magneto Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. United States v. American Steel & Copper Plate Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. Wedemeyer v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
  4. Pritchard v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  5. Hensel, Bruckmann & Lorbacher, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Schwarz v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  2. Rausch v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  3. Rocky Cycle Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API