Legal Opinion

State v. Vettere

Montana Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1926No. 6,013PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Callaway

After this court affirmed the judgment in this cause (State v. Vettere, 76 Mont. 574, 248 Pac. 179), the defendant, after notice to his counsel, was brought into the district court for further proceedings, agreeably to section 12101, Rev. Codes 1921, which provides: “If for any reason a judgment of death has not been executed, and it remains in force, the court in which the conviction was had, on the application of the county attorney, must order the defendant to be brought before it, or if he is at large, a warrant for his apprehension may be issued. Upon the defendant being brought before…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. HowardMontana Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Spratt v. Helena Power Transmission Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Barth v. PockMontana Supreme Court · 1915
  4. People v. HettickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  5. People v. GeigerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Brooks v. CookMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Twin Falls Canal Co. v. HuffIdaho Supreme Court · 1938
  3. McMahon v. CooneyMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  4. State v. KitchensMontana Supreme Court · 1955
  5. State Ex Rel. City of Wolf Point v. McFarlanMontana Supreme Court · 1927

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API