Legal Opinion

People v. Geiger

California Supreme Court

Decided April 7, 1897No. Crim. No. 201PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Hapa County and from an order denying a new trial. E. I). Ham, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Britt, C.

Defendant was charged with the crime of burglary perpetrated on October 9, 1895. When the case was called for trial he moved the court to stay all proceedings against him, and assigned as ground for such motion that he had been regularly committed as an insane person to an asylum for such persons, had not been legally discharged therefrom, and was then insane. The proof was that on November 9, 1892, he was duly committed by a judge of the superior court to the state asylum for the insane at Napa; he escaped therefrom on December 24, 1894, and never returned; no attempt was made to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Kellogg v. CochranCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  2. People v. HandleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  2. People v. LindleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
  3. State v. HowardMontana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. People v. GilbergCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. People v. StevensCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API