Puryear v. Stanley
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PUGLIA, P. J.
Defendant Mark Stanley appeals from an order denying his motion to set aside a default and default judgment. The motion was noticed within six months of entry of default but was defective in that it was unaccompanied by a proposed answer or other responsive pleading as required by Code of Civil Procedure section 473. The single issue on appeal is whether that defect may be cured after the six-month period has expired within which such motions must be brought. We hold that it may not.
On August 19, 1981, plaintiff filed a verified complaint alleging that defendant, a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Lynch v. SpilmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Beard v. BeardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- County of Los Angeles v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Roseborough v. CampbellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- Carver v. PlattCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Huh v. WangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
- HUH v. WangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Job v. FarringtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989