Legal Opinion

Job v. Farrington

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 3, 1989No. Docket Nos. B020455, B023866PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ABBE, J.

Ron Farrington appeals from an order denying his motion to set aside his default and from the default judgment entered against him. We reverse and remand.

On October 24, 1983, Job filed a complaint against his former son-in-law, Jay Williams, and many others, including Farrington. The essence of the lengthy complaint is that Williams made fraudulent representations to Job to induce him into guaranteeing several lines of credit extended to Williams’s business of buying and selling cattle. It is alleged that Williams then manipulated those lines of credit as part of a conspiracy…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. County of Los Angeles v. LewisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Sousa v. Capital Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Puryear v. StanleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Carmel, Ltd. v. TavoussiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. Austin v. Los Angeles Unified School Dist.California Court of Appeal · 2016
  3. Dollase v. Wanu Water Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API