Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Pang Sui Lin

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 1, 1911No. Crim. No. 139PublishedCited by 11 opinions

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tuolumne County, and from an order denying a new trial. G. W. Nicol, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.

The defendants, who are of the Mongolian race, were convicted of robbing another Chinaman, and they appeal from the judgment and the order denying their motion for a new trial.

Several assignments of error are made, but, save one, we deem them'without substantial merit.

During the cross-examination of one of the defendants the following proceedings, as shown by the transcript, took place:

“The district attorney asked the following question: Is it not a fact that you stole from a merchant in Virginia City the woman you are living with now ?
“Mr. Webster: We object.
“Witness: I never been in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. People v. DerwaeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. People v. AmerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. Arwine v. Board of Med. ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  5. People v. DerbertCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. People v. HamiltonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  2. People v. PurvisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. People v. HailCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  4. People v. TerramorseCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916
  5. In Re De VoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API