People v. Hail
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Plumas County and from an order refusing a new trial. J. 0. Moncur, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
The defendant; having been convicted of the crime of manslaughter under an information filed in the superior court of Plumas County, charging him with the crime of murder, alleged to have been committed at Quincy, in said county, on the sixteenth day of August, 1913, prosecutes these appeals from the judgment and the order denying him a new trial.
The assignments of error are numerous and may be stated in orderly sequence as follows: 1. That the evidence does not support the verdict; 2. That the court erred in certain rulings whereby certain evidence was admitted and certain evidence…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- People v. . FieldingNew York Court of Appeals · 1899
- People v. FlemingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- Vickers v. United StatesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908
- People v. DevineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- People v. Ah LenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- People v. HorowitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
- People v. PantagesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Safer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. ShawCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- People v. AdamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.