Legal Opinion

In Re De Voe

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 12, 1931No. Docket No. 2068PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHouser, J.

In an action in the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, petitioner having been convicted of the crime of grand theft and her motion for a new trial having been denied, she appealed to this court from such order. Thereafter, she having applied to the trial court for probation, on the day when such matter came on for hearing, and prior to the or any public announcement having been made by the judge of the trial court as to his ruling on such application, the defendant asked leave of the trial court to withdraw from its consideration her application for probation— which request was by said…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. Ventura Refining Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
  2. People v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Robinson v. BidwellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
  4. French v. TeschemakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  5. A. F. Estabrook Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In Re OssloCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. People v. De VoeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. People v. RojasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  4. Pueblo v. Vega CedeñoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1948
  5. People v. MortonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API