Legal Opinion

Rediger v. Country Mutual Insurance Company

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided May 19, 2021No. 6:16-cv-02263Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION JARED AND MYRANDA REDIGER; Case No. 6:16-cv-02263-AA HAYSTORM HARVESTING & FIBER INC., OPINION AND ORDER Plaintiff, vs. COUNTRY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Defendant. AIKEN, District Judge: Defendant Country Mutual Insurance Company (“Country Mutual”) filed this Motion for Partial Summary Judgment (doc. 93) as to claims brought against it by plaintiffs Jared Rediger, Myranda Rediger, and Haystorm Harvesting & Fiber, Inc. For the reasons stated herein, the motion is DENIED. BACKGROUND Haystorm Harvesting & Fiber, Inc.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Diaz v. Eagle Produce Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  4. Kennedy v. Allied Mutual Insurance Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Charles Yeager v. Connie BowlinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API