Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Butcher

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 29, 1931No. 6 Div. 716PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

The action is by materialmen against the surety on a contractor’s bond, given for the faithful performance of a contract made with the board of education of the city of Birming. ham for the construction of a public building known as “Washington School.”

The bond, by its terms, secures the payment of claims for labor and material furnished directly to the contractor. General Acts 1927, p. 37.

The one. question presented on appeal is whether the surety is entitled to have certain payments made by the contractor to these several materialmen applied in exoneration of the surety pro tanto. Such…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Chicago Lumber Co. v. DouglasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  2. Standard Oil Co. v. DaySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  3. Sturtevant Co. v. Fidelity & Deposit Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Salt Lake City v. O'ConnorUtah Supreme Court · 1926
  5. People ex rel. Hirth v. PowersMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. First Nat. Bank of LincolnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. Security Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Underwood Coal & Supply Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1943
  4. Union Indemnity Co. v. RicksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  5. State Bank of Wheatland v. TurpenWyoming Supreme Court · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API