Legal Opinion
Salt Lake City v. O'Connor
Utah Supreme Court
Decided June 1, 1926No. 4326PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCherry, J.
This action arises out of a contract for certain public work in Salt Lake City, and involves the determination of certain claims of materialmen against the surety upon the bond of the contractor, and the distribution of the remainder due and unpaid upon the contract price. On October 23, 1922, John O’Connor (hereinafter called the contractor) entered into a contract with Salt Lake City for the construction of sewer extension 410, and pursuant to Comp. Laws Utah 1917, § 3753, executed and delivered a bond in the sum of $31,000, conditioned for the faithful performance of his contract and the…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Prairie State Bank v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Henningsen v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. of BaltimoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Hardaway v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- First Nat. Bank of Seattle v. City Trust, Safe Deposit & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902
- Chicago Lumber Co. v. DouglasSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- United States v. Johnson, Smathers & RollinsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
- Glades County, Fla. v. Detroit Fidelity & Surety Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932
- Templeton v. Sam Klain & Son, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1981
- Geneva Pipe Co. v. S & H Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1986
- National Surety Corporation v. FisherSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.