Legal Opinion

Union Indemnity Co. v. Ricks

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 10, 1932No. 6 Div. 751PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBouddin, J.

The action is against the surety upon a contractor’s bond for construction of a state highway, project S-170, in Blount county. Gen. Acts 1927, p. 356, §~28.

The appeal is to review judgments rendered in favor of certain interveners, upon claims against the contractor for labor and materials.

The point is here raised that the original suit, brought by J. R. Ricks, in which all other claimants intervened as per statute and order of court, was prematurely brought.

Under our statute, no suit on the bond shall be “commenced until after the complete performance of said contract and final settlement…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fleischmann Construction Co. v. United States Ex Rel. ForsbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Illinois Surety Co. v. United States Ex Rel. PeelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
  3. Foster v. NapierSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Benson Hardware Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  5. Mahoney v. O'LearySupreme Court of Alabama · 1859

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. AlexanderOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Royal Indemnity Co. v. Young & Vann Supply Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  3. John E. Ballenger Const. Co. v. Joe F. Walters Const. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1938
  4. Magic City Paint & Varnish Co. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1934
  5. Benson Paint & Varnish Co. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API