Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Jasmin

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided January 30, 1986PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

The defendant was convicted under an indictment charging him with possession of drug paraphernalia with intent to sell in circumstances where he knew or should have known that the objects would be put to an unlawful use in violation of G. L. c. 94C. See G. L. c. 94C, § 321 {a) (1984 ed.). Section 321, the so-called “anti-drug paraphernalia” act, had become effective only a few months before the defendant was arrested in May, 1982, for its violation. St. 1981, c. 669, § 2. This is the first case in which we have considered a conviction under this statute.

In May, 1982, Springfield police…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Parker v. LevySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Town Tobacconist v. KimmelmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  5. William Stoianoff D/B/A the Joint Effort, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. State of Montana, Defendants-Appellees/cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Department of Youth Services v. a JuvenileMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1986
  2. Commonwealth v. PowellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
  3. Commonwealth v. ChouMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2001
  4. Commonwealth v. KwiatkowskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1994
  5. Commonwealth v. OakesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API