William Stoianoff D/B/A the Joint Effort, Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. State of Montana, Defendants-Appellees/cross-Appellants
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TUTTLE, Circuit Judge:
This appeal involves a pre-enforcement facial challenge to the constitutionality of the Montana Drug Paraphernalia statute, M.C.A. §§ 45-10-101 et seq. The district court for the District of Montana found unconstitutional that portion of the “head shop” statute prohibiting the advertising of drug paraphernalia and upheld the constitutionality of the remainder of this statute. We vacate that portion of the district court’s decision striking down the advertising prohibition, M.C.A. § 45-10-106, because the plaintiff lacks standing to assert this claim, and affirm the other…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by110 opinions
- Wolfson v. BrammerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- National Rifle Ass'n of America v. MagawCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- Peoples Rights Organization, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross-Appellants v. City of Columbus, Defendants-Appellants/cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
- Sánchez v. Secretario de JusticiaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2002
- Action Apartment Ass'n v. Santa Monica Rent Control BoardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
105 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.