Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Kwiatkowski

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided August 3, 1994PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWilkins, J.

The defendant challenges a portion of the Commonwealth’s new stalking statute, G. L. c. 265, § 43, inserted by St. 1992, c. 31, as facially vague and hence unconstitutional. We agree that the stalking statute is unconstitutionally vague in the respect asserted. Hence, it may not be enforced against the defendant, and his conviction of the crime of stalking must be reversed. It is within the proper authority of this court to construe G. L. c. 265, § 43, prospectively to eliminate the identified uncertainty in its draftsmanship (see Commonwealth v. Sefranka, 382 Mass. 108, 111 [1980]), and we…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Osborne v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Commonwealth v. a JuvenileMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1975
  3. Kneeland v. EmertonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  4. Commonwealth v. SefrankaMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1980
  5. TODD SHIPYARDS CORP., Petitioner, v. SECRETARY OF LABOR, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AlphasMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1999
  2. People v. StuartNew York Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. United States v. SnyderCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  4. Commonwealth v. WelchMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
  5. State v. RuckerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1999

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API