Legal Opinion

People v. Drolet

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 1909No. Docket No. 114PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Exceptions before judgment from the recorder’s court of Detroit; Phelan, J. Charles Drolet was convicted of an assault with intent to do great bodily harm less than the crime of murder.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The respondent was convicted of a charge *91of assault with a deadly weapon with intent to do great bodily harm less than the crime of murder. The case is brought here by writ of error before sentence.

It is claimed the assault was made upon one Calvin. The theory of the people was that the respondent, smarting under a defeat in a wrestling match with the complaining witness, left his barroom, went to the living apartments over the saloon, armed himself with a revolver, came down, and deliberately shot the complaining witness, who was unarmed, and who at the time he was shot was standing with his…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Geary v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1871
  2. People v. RowMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Patten v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Hamilton v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Crippen v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1860

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Villaroman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1950
  2. State v. HartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  3. Martin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. People v. KarcherMichigan Supreme Court · 1948
  5. State v. DeckerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API