Legal Opinion

Martin v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 9, 2001No. 123, Sept. Term, 2000PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RAKER, Judge.

Petitioner, a former Baltimore City police officer, appeals from his conviction for theft under the value of $300 and misconduct in office. He complains that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to permit his attorney to cross-examine the complaining witness as to whether he had hired an attorney to file a lawsuit on his behalf against Baltimore City. We agree with petitioner and shall reverse the judgments of conviction. We shall hold that the trial court’s denial of cross-examination regarding contemplated civil action was error and that the error was not harmless…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
  2. State v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Merzbacher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  4. State v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  5. State v. ArlingtonMontana Supreme Court · 1994

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Dionas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  2. State v. ANGEL T.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  3. Devincentz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  4. Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. Myer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API