Martin v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
RAKER, Judge.
Petitioner, a former Baltimore City police officer, appeals from his conviction for theft under the value of $300 and misconduct in office. He complains that the trial court abused its discretion in refusing to permit his attorney to cross-examine the complaining witness as to whether he had hired an attorney to file a lawsuit on his behalf against Baltimore City. We agree with petitioner and shall reverse the judgments of conviction. We shall hold that the trial court’s denial of cross-examination regarding contemplated civil action was error and that the error was not harmless…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Dorsey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1976
- State v. FergusonOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Merzbacher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- State v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- State v. ArlingtonMontana Supreme Court · 1994
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Dionas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- State v. ANGEL T.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Devincentz v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
- Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
- Myer v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2008
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.