Decker v. Oklahoma State University
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
OPALA, Justice.
The dispositive issue presented on certio-rari is whether the claimant’s heart attack, which was claimed to have been caused by mental stress and anxiety created within the work environment, resulted from a risk reasonably incident to employment. We answer in the affirmative, because there is competent evidence that a change in the administrative structure of claimant’s work environment caused the mental stress and that his supervisors knew about, but did nothing to alleviate, the stressful workplace milieu.
FACTS
In August 1981 Kenneth Decker [claimant or worker] became employed…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Thomas v. Keith Hensel Optical LabsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Special Indemnity Fund v. StocktonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Novak v. McAlisterSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
- Bill Gover Ford Company v. RonigerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1967
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- TRW/Reda Pump v. BrewingtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- Lanman v. Oklahoma County Sheriff's OfficeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- PFL Life Insurance Co. v. FranklinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- City of Edmond v. MondaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Oklahoma Petroleum Workers' Compensation Ass'n v. Mid-Continent Casualty Co.Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1994
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.