Legal Opinion

Dallas Coffin Co. v. Yeager

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 26, 1929No. 8240PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

R. W. Hedleston, an Eagle Pass undertaker, was indebted to the Dallas Coffin Company for part of the purchase price of his stock of goods, and while so indebted sold, transferred, and delivered his entire stock, in bulk, to Claude'Yeager, who continued the operation of the business. Subsequently the Coffin Company recovered judgment against Hedleston for the amount of the debt, and had writ of garnishment issued and served upon Yeager, who answered that he had nothing in his possession belonging to Hedleston. The Coffin Company, garnishor, traversed this answer, setting up the fact that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Owosso Carriage & Sleigh Co. v. McIntosh & WarrenTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Gerlach Mercantile Co. v. Hughes-Bozarth-Anderson Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  3. Mayfield Co. v. Harlan HarlanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  4. Cornish v. Nance Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Kell Milling Co. v. H. O. Wooten Grocery Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1917

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Yeager v. Dallas Coffin Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  2. Yeager v. Dallas Coffin Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Second Nat. Bank of Houston v. SettegastCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Second Nat. Bank of Houston v. SettegastCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API