Legal Opinion

Gerlach Mercantile Co. v. Hughes-Bozarth-Anderson Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 1, 1916No. 10154. [fn*]PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Hemphill County; C. Coffee, Special Judge. Garnishment proceedings by the Hughes-Bozarth-Anderson Company against the Ger-lach Mercantile Company. From a judgment for plaintiff, the garnishee appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

* Application for writ of error pending in Supreme Court. This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the appellee, Hughes-Bozarth-Anderson Company, against the appellant, Gerlach Mercantile Company, for the sum of $809.45, being the principal and interest of an indebtedness due by James Margetts to the appellees, as established by a judgment in favor of appellees, against Margetts in cause No. 710, on the district court docket.

On the 7th day of December, 1914, the appellees, in cause No. 710, Hughes-Bozarth-Anderson Co. v. James Margetts, sued out a writ of garnishment, causing its…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Brown v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1827
  2. Crawford v. McDonaldTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Coleman v. ZappTexas Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Hardy v. BeatyTexas Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Fitch v. BoyerTexas Supreme Court · 1879

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Nevitt v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Fischer v. Rio Tire Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1933
  3. Rogers v. LancasterTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  4. Campbell v. HartCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  5. Settegast v. Second National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1935

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API