Legal Opinion

Yeager v. Dallas Coffin Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided February 3, 1932No. 8730PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

After obtaining a! judgment in a Dallas county court against R. W. Hedleston, appel-lee garnished appellant, who had purchased Hedleston’s undertaking business, stock, appliances, and office furniture. Appellant answered, as garnishee, denying that he was indebted to Hedleston or had possession of any of the latter’s effects. Appellee traversed that answer, alleging and conclusively proving that appellant had purchased Hedleston’s stock in bulk without complying with the" provision of the Bulk Sales Law (article 4001, Rev. St.) requiring the seller to furnish him with a list of the seller’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People's Savings Bank v. Van AllsburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Bowen v. QuigleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Axtell Co. v. WordCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930
  4. Dallas Coffin Co. v. YeagerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Yeager v. Dallas Coffin Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  2. Butler Bros. v. SinkinTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Sinkin v. Butler Bros.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. San Antonio MacHine & Supply Co. v. McCarthyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API