Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Sloman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 17, 1898PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Certiorari by Alfred Jackson to review the action of the auditor general in issuing certain certificates of error upon the application of Eugene H. Sloman.

1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.

Sloman was the owner of certain lots in the city of Detroit, which were assessed as “lots numbered 3, 4, 35 [and many others, whose numbers were given] of the P. & P. M. subdivision of part of N. E. £ of fractional section 17, T. 2 S., R. 11 E., lying south of and adjoining Chicago road, according to plat thereof, township of Springwells, county of Wayne, and State of Michigan.” The recorded plat of which these lots are a portion is the “E. & P. M. Park subdivision of part of fractional section 17, T. 2 S., R. 11 E.,” as appears from the return. These lots were sold for the taxes of 1893.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Auditor General v. SparrowMichigan Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Jones v. PelhamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1887
  3. People v. MahoneyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. G. F. Sanborn Co. v. AlstonMichigan Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Cole v. Auditor GeneralMichigan Supreme Court · 1903
  3. Sleight v. RoeMichigan Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Savidge v. SeagerMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Brown v. Reeves & Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1903

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API